temporization$82165$ - meaning and definition. What is temporization$82165$
Diclib.com
ChatGPT AI Dictionary
Enter a word or phrase in any language 👆
Language:

Translation and analysis of words by ChatGPT artificial intelligence

On this page you can get a detailed analysis of a word or phrase, produced by the best artificial intelligence technology to date:

  • how the word is used
  • frequency of use
  • it is used more often in oral or written speech
  • word translation options
  • usage examples (several phrases with translation)
  • etymology

What (who) is temporization$82165$ - definition

TYPE OF DISPUTE RESOLUTION WHERE EACH PARTY GIVES UP PART OF THEIR DEMAND TO REACH A SOLUTION THEY CAN ALL AGREE ON
Temporized; Compromised; Compromise of; Temporization; Compromising
  • Chamberlain (left) and Hitler, 1938.

compromise         
1) n. an agreement between opposing parties to settle a dispute or reach a settlement in which each gives some ground, rather than continue the dispute or go to trial. Judges encourage compromise and settlement, which is often economically sensible, since it avoids mounting attorneys' fees and costs. 2) v. to reach a settlement in which each party gives up some demands. See also: settlement
compromise         
I. n.
Agreement, composition, adjustment, settlement, mutual concession, abatement of differences.
II. v. a.
1.
Adjust, settle, compose, compound.
2.
Jeopardize (irretrievably), imperil, bring into danger, put at hazard, put in jeopardy, expose the repute of.
3.
Engage, pledge, implicate, commit.
III. v. n.
Agree, compound, come to an agreement, come to an understanding, settle or compose or compound differences or disputes.
Compromising         
·p.pr. & ·vb.n. of Compromise.

Wikipedia

Compromise

To compromise is to make a deal between different parties where each party gives up part of their demand. In arguments, compromise is a concept of finding agreement through communication, through a mutual acceptance of terms—often involving variations from an original goal or desires. Defining and finding the best possible compromise is an important problem in fields like game theory and the voting system.

Research has indicated that suboptimal compromises are often the result of negotiators failing to realize when they have interests that are completely compatible with those of the other party and settle for suboptimal agreements. Mutually better outcomes can often be found by careful investigation of both parties' interests, especially if done early in negotiations.

The compromise solution of a multicriteria decision making or multi-criteria decision analysis problem that is the closest to the ideal could be determined by the VIKOR method, which provides a maximum utility of the majority, and a minimum individual regret of the opponent.